IV Shooting with Impunity at the Messenger

Everything that we have, in terms of evidence, is pointing with considerable force and clarity in one and only one direction --that Mr. Ganor clearly is not the Holocaust survivor he purports to be, and that for sure he is not a credible witness of the Holocaust. Then, in such a scenario, there is only one remaining way to get out of it: attack the messenger of this scenario with everything available to you. Shooting at the messenger is indeed a tactic capable of deflecting the attention from the real issues at hand. And this tactic has proven to be successful so many times, in so many situations. Not here, however.

 In here, we we will stay focus, as a laser beam, to the issues at hand of the Ganor case of credibility and deceit, and nothing else.

We have no interest whatsover to downgrade our Holocaust memorial website to the level desired perhaps by Mr. Tilove. So finally, Mr. Tilove has found a level from where he can shoot randomly and at will, in any direction desired, encountering no opposition from us in here. Our website, as noted, cannot possibly be dragged at the level of Mr. Tilove's shooting. That is a level that we, for sure, stay away from it completely.

What that garbage introduced by Mr. Tilove has to do with anything is, of course, anybody's guess. Mr. Tilove's affinity with that kind of trash may perhaps reveal a lot about Mr. Tilove himself, but that again is something well bellow the belt, so to speak.

It is however nevertheless irresistible not to note the little appreciation that Mr. Tilove has for our American Judicial System --that is the envy of the world. Mr. Tilove noted with some sarcasm and perhaps cynicism how a Court of Appeals overturned a verdict on the "mere ground" that the trial judge erred in the definition of the alleged crime involved. Can there be any more potent reason for not overturning a trial court's verdict than the one of misstating therein the definition of the alleged crime involved?

Do we have any takers not seeing this?

Ironically, Mr. Tilove expressed to us his concerns about the "simple decency" that should guide one's writings. In his email of May 12, 2006 addressed to this editor, Mr. Tilove wrote:

From this site and your others it appears that you enjoy no holds-barred controversy.
But doesn't simple decency suggest certain limits?

Those concerns on "simple decency" are commendable indeed, but are nowhere to be found in Mr. Tilove's current writing. Preaching and purporting to be concern with "simple decency" is easy, living by it appears to be an entirely different matter for Mr. Tilove.

Mr. Tilove's apparent affinity towards trash is, of course, his business and, no one, not even God, can take that away from him, so let him have it !

 

 
.