I. Opening Statement
There are
a lot of clever people out
there who learn how to
manipulate the [Internet]
technology in order to
spread [as in
<iSurvived.org>]
their agenda of hatred."
|
Rabbi
Cooper,
Daily
Breeze, July 2005
|
Apparently being solicited
by Diana Day, a staff reporter of a
California, USA, "zine" Internet
publication <DailyBreeze.com> to
comment on our posting of the critical study of
Eric Saul,
[where he was
exposed to be a Holocaust
research impostor that has
pushed for some six (6) years,
through his bogus educational
Holocaust exhibition "Visas
for Life: The Righteous
Diplomats," his petition and
the claim to
the Yad Vashem
that the late American
Vice-Consul Hiram "Harry"
Bingham IV was an unsung
Holocaust hero that needed to
be awarded by Yad Vashem with
the "Righteous Among the
Nations" title --a title and
claim that ultimately was rejected by
Yad Vashem
on March 7,
2005, and being in unison with
our
own findings],
|
Rabbi Abraham Cooper, associate dean of
the Simon Wiesenthal Center, in a stunning
move, chose that dubious Internet outlet
to attack us publicly under the umbrella
that he is attacking an "agenda of hatred"
that appears to be Rabbi Cooper's
"specialty."
In
addition, for unknown reasons, Rabbi
Cooper publicly has been threatening us
with some sort of undisclosed action.
Referring directly to this editor, Rabbi
Cooper is being quoted as saying:
"I am
certainly not going to
broadcast to this individual
[Brattman] through the media.
I'm not going to comment to
the media about what steps
we're going to take."
|
Well, all that public denunciation thrown
at us, for no apparent or known reason, by
Rabbi Cooper, put us in a situation that
requires a public response as silence, for
us, is not an option. We owe such a
response to our readers and to our
extended family of
Holocaust survivors.
II. On the Absurdity of
Rabbi Cooper's Campaign in Censoring the
Internet
As we have been made aware
in preparing for this response, almost
from the inception of the Internet, in the
mid 90s, Rabbi Cooper began a relentless
campaign (***see, our Selected Links posted
herein at the bottom of the page) for censoring
and limiting the spread of the Internet on
the grounds that the Internet, by not
being regulated by anyone, has the
potential of creating great harm to the
society as a whole by being able of
disseminating and inciting uncontrollably
hate, anti-Semitism, misrepresentation, as
well as being able to promote illegal
activities.
We
respectfully, notwithstanding those
concerns expressed by Rabbi Cooper, see
the "open" Internet as an invaluable tool
in being able to keep us abreast of our
friends and foes alike --on their doings,
propaganda, intentions, thinking, and modus
operandi. In this respect, for
those of us that subscribe to the dictum
"Keep your friends close, keep your
enemies closer," the Internet is an
invaluable source of information.
It is a
sobering thought in pondering whether the
Holocaust could have been prevented or
considerably diminished if the Internet
would have been in place say, some
seventy (70) years ago in the predawn
era of the Nazi regime... And that is
because if the world would have been
rapidly made aware (through a cheap
mass-media tool such as the advent of the
Internet) of the many signs leading to the
Holocaust, then perhaps the outcome of the
Nazi campaign would have been vastly
different...
Today,
the security agencies of most, if not all,
countries use the "unregulated" Internet
as an invaluable tool in identifying and
combating terrorism and illegal
activities. To censor the Internet, as
advocated with such zeal by Rabbi Cooper,
would undermine and cripple those efforts
in a considerable way.
And for
those of us who cherish the freedom of
expression and consider it as a
cornerstone of the human dignity, the
"uncensored" Internet is the ultimate
frontier of that expression. In this
respect, the "uncensored" Internet is
perhaps the best thing ever happened to
mankind and human spirit from its long and
tortuous evolution. The 'tolerance' that
so vividly is being portrayed in the Simon
Wiesenthal Center (SWC) through its Museum
of Tolerance apparently is totally absent
from Rabbi Cooper's makeup.
OUR
|
.
|
On guard
24/7
|
The
Internet should remain and stand as the
uncensored expression of anyone regardless
of the person's background, religion,
creed, sex, age, nationality, level of
formal education, beliefs, or purpose of
expression. The Internet should represent
and remain the pure bastion of freedom in
its true and uncensored form.
History
has learned us that societies which
embrace "censorship" are ultimately doomed
to self extinction. Should
Rabbi Cooper have been born in an
oppressed and heavily "censored" society
(such as in a Communist society as this
editor has), Rabbi Cooper undoubtedly
would have appreciated far more the
meaning of freedom of expression and
liberty.
Rabbi Cooper who
was born in New York, knows
better than most of us
immigrants, that in the United
States, more than anywhere else
in the world, the freedom of
free speech --regardless how
offensive and distasteful it may
be-- is at the foundation of the
entire American culture and
protected scrupulously by the
First Amendment to the U.S.
Constitution that is one of the
most cherished "commodity" of
the people of the United States
and, at the same time, the envy
of the world. Many Americans
have paid with their ultimate
sacrifice so that
Rabbi Cooper and this
editor could have their say
freely...
|
|
III.
On the Hypocrisy of Rabbi Cooper's
Concerns
with Respect to the Quality of
Information Posted in the "Open"
Internet
Clearly not all things are
made of the same quality or be subject to
the same quality control. In this regard,
WHY the Internet would be different than
any other man-made or natural-made
product? Clearly the Daily Breeze
publication is not The New York Times
or The Wall Street Journal.
There
are people, such as Rabbi Cooper, that for
instance would give interviews for a Daily
Breeze or the like publication.
There are other people, like us, that
under absolute no circumstance would honor
a Daily Breeze publication and the
like for an interview. There are people,
such as Rabbi Cooper, that have no problem
in throwing stones, left and right, under
the umbrella that those actions are
fighting hate and the evil when in fact,
those very actions are exactly what hate
and evil are made of...!
Preaching
nice and wonderful sermons is rather easy
as it requires only oratory skills. Living
by the principles vested in those sermons
is far more difficult as it requires
character and discipline. For Rabbi
Cooper, the preaching and the practicing
appears to be two (2) distant and
completely unrelated entities as can be
seen, so eloquently, from his Daily
Breeze interview.
In the
same Daily Breeze article that
Rabbi Cooper has chosen for his attack on
us, the reader is also able to see this
additional misinformation that is being
posted, and we quote:
1. "Since
the inception of the
"Righteous Among the
Nations" project in 1963,
Yad Vashem has honored 18
people with the title.
Recipients must have risked
their lives while helping
Jews, to qualify for the
honor. "
|
Clearly, Rabbi
Cooper must be fully aware
--we hope-- that this
information is not correct as
Yad Vashem has recognized
and honored not 18 but over
twenty thousands (20,000)
"Righteous Among the Nations"
individuals...
2. "Brattman's
site also includes a section
attacking Bingham, now
deceased, saying he was an
adulterer and an anti-Semite
who did not qualify as a
Holocaust hero."
|
The fact that
the late Bingham IV was an
adulterer and later in life
transformed into a hater of
Jews and a Holocaust denier
has nothing to do with WHY on
March 7, 2005, he
was rejected by Yad Vashem to
be awarded with the Righteous
title.
By
the way, it was Yad
Vashem
and not Brattman that rendered
the final "no hero" status on
the late
Bingham IV ! (See,
if you will, our Yad Vashem
posting in here.)
Also, as it is well know,
Oskar Schindler, for instance,
was also an adulterer but that
has had nothing to do with the
fact that he, unlike
Bingham IV, saved many
Jewish lives and thus, awarded
with the Righteous title by
Yad Vashem.
In the
Bingham IV case, Yad Vashem,
after some seven (7) years of
study was not able to find any
credible evidence that Bingham
IV saved even one single
Jewish life from the
Holocaust. That was the
reason, and nothing else, as
to WHY Yad Vashem could not
award Bingham IV with the
Righteous title.
Bingham IV was NOT a
rescuer of Jews --by any
stretch of imagination, but a
good, decent , and
compassionate man during evil
times --as noted by us in our study,
and supported by Yad Vashem.
Rabbi
Cooper may disagree with the
Yad Vashem's findings and he
may even place Yad Vashem on
his hate-watch list... That is
most certainly Rabbi Cooper's
prerogative.
We, on the
other hand, are pleased that
Yad Vashem took notice of our
rather singular
work
in rendering its final
decision on Bingham IV
--a work that Yad Vashem could
not have seen where not for
the uncensored and open
Internet available in the
countries that do not embrace
the censorship.
|
With
this being said, the hypocrisy of Rabbi
Cooper appears to be monumental, truly of
cosmic proportion:
- on
one hand, Rabbi Cooper is preaching the
world about the "ugliness" of the
Internet and of the dangers that it
poses as lacking quality control...
- on
the other hand, we see the same Rabbi
Cooper using the uncensored Internet
with throwing stones left at right,
arguably at will, through an Internet
posting of questionable repute and
"quality control" full of clear
misrepresentations.
|
Censoring the
Internet is good, in Rabbi
Cooper's mind, as long as it
does not apply to him...
Well,
that is the lesson that Rabbi
Cooper appears to be conveying
to us in here. On that note, may
we respectfully remind
Rabbi Cooper that what is
good for the goose is also good
for the gander...
|
|
IV.
On Rabbi Cooper's Nonsensical Claim
that our Holocaust Memorial Website
Foster an Agenda of Hatred
"The Web is
not a debating society. It's
there for marketing and
advertising." [sic!]
"The Wiesenthal Center is
not looking to regulate the
Internet, but it is
important to put a crimp
into hate sites. Americans
have a right not to do
business with those who
promote hate."
|
Rabbi
Cooper,
Virginia
Bar Association Annual
Meeting
January
14, 2000
|
Just because in our course
of studying the Bingham IV case, as
revealed in our Open
Invitation to debate that matter, we
have stumbled upon and exposed a Holocaust
research impostor with ZERO academic
credentials named Eric Saul (who back
in 1998 submitted a Petition before Yad
Vashem to award Bingham IV with a
Righteous title that ultimately led Yad
Vashem in rejecting that Petition --see in here, if you
will, our posted study), that fact and
that exposure, by any rational standards,
cannot possible be construed as an "agenda
of hatred."
Is that
the "agenda of hatred" which Rabbi Cooper
has been alluding to in the Daily
Breeze? OR, Is it perhaps something
entirely different? We do not have a clue
on that score.
Maybe
Rabbi Cooper is objecting to our posting
of the internationally acclaimed photomontage of the
Auschwitz Album with captions by
Oliver Lustig --a compatriot of this
editor and a Birkenau-Auschwitz Holocaust
survivor-- that is currently posted in Danish, Dutch, English, French, German, Hungarian, Italian, Polish, and Russian translations
from the original Romanian text
received. (How is that for a multilingual
agenda...!)
Whatever
Rabbi Cooper's annoyance is with us, that
--most certainly-- needs not be confused,
construed, or equated with an "agenda of
hatred!"
Maybe
Rabbi Cooper would have the decency, that
one expects from a rabbi, to explain
himself and let us know WHAT in God's name
was he talking about? WHAT "agenda of
hatred" was he able to detect from our
tributary work on the Holocaust and its
tragic legacy?
V. On the issue of
Character Displayed by Rabbi Cooper
For the great majority of
people, Jews and non-Jews alike,
regardless whether or not they subscribe
to a particular organized religion, a
rabbi is a special holy person whose life
is mirrored in the Torah
teachings. Stabbing Jewish people in the
back, as Rabbi Cooper did in the Daily
Breeze article, appears to be
fundamentally incompatible with the
demeanor and the character of a rabbi. We
however could be wrong on this score as we
have no formal training or education in
the teachings of the Torah (or of
any other organized religion).
VI. Concluding
Remarks
Rabbi Cooper's unprovoked
public attack on us and our work was
shocking indeed particularly since we do
not have a clue of the scope, purpose,
motive, or reason involved.
We
surely would appreciate receiving from
Rabbi Cooper some sort of explanation on
all this so to be able to post it herein
for our worldwide readers.
We hope
the best and pray for Rabbi Cooper's
troubled mind.
Respectfully
submitted,
K. K. Brattman
Managing Editor
|