We respectfully take exception to Dr. Wilkie
contention that he " was not
speaking on behalf of Oxford University or any of its
constituent parts" when replied to Mr. Duvshani's
inquiry as this proposition it offends our intelligence.
In his response, Dr. Wilkie is
using the University email address, is responding in
reference to an inquiry of a specific Ph.D. program
offered by the University and, is invoking at the end of
his email his full academic title within the University.
How in God's name anyone can construe anything but that
this was the official answer coming from the
And if this untruthfulness of
Dr. Wilkie's apology is a reflection of his true
character, then watch out and be not too surprised to
find in Dr. Wilkie's work forged or fabricated
scientific data to accommodate a particular desired
result or to find scientific work done by his younger
associates and attributed to him. Yes, the true portrait
of Dr. Wilkie may be quite different indeed from the one
that he attempts portraying to us.